Thursday, October 16, 2014

Debra LaFave - Probation Early Termination Approved by Florida Supreme Court

The too-pretty-for-prison teacher, Debra LaFave was released from probation early by today's ruling in the Florida Supreme Court. The Court ruled that the state attorney could not appeal the trial court's order terminating the probation, even though the no prison plea agreement provided that her probation was not to be terminated early. 

The Florida Supreme Court said:

Early Termination of Probation


"Six years into her ten-year nonprison sentence, LaFave unabashedly sought early termination of her probation in 2011 in direct violation of her plea agreement. She asked the circuit court to terminate her sex offender probation four years early. On October 3, 2011, over objections from both the state attorney and the Department of Corrections [(DOC)], the circuit court granted her motion and terminated her probation as requested. "

"We answer the certified question in the negative and find that the State did not have the right to petition the district court [to appeal the decision] for certiorari review in this case." 

Complete Decision Here: 



Thursday, September 25, 2014

Executive Clemency Initiative - Five Possible Requirements

Executive Clemency Initiative, Clemency, Clemency review, Clemency Law, Clemency Lawyers
Executive Clemency Initiative
Five Possible Requirements
Update:  September 25, 2014 - Attorney General Holder Resigns

Our team has begun organization of resources for expediting the clemency petitions to be filed under the new Executive Clemency Initiative. Two Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyers and a number of other attorneys and paralegals are standing by in offices near the Coleman Federal Prison in Florida.

We believe most inmates will eventually receive some attention. However, our plan is to quickly gather needed information, and expedite the completion of the case file for federal authorities to review. Remember there are Five Possible Requirements and the initiative is limited. 

Five Requirements for Clemency Eligibility


• Are currently serving a federal sentence in prison and, by operation of law, likely would have received a substantially lower sentence if convicted of the same offense(s) today; 

• Are non-violent, low-level offenders without significant ties to large-scale criminal organizations, gangs, or cartels; 

• Have served at least 10 years of their sentence; 

• Do not have a significant criminal history; 

• Have demonstrated good conduct in prison; and 

• Have no history of violence prior to or during their current term of imprisonment.

For More Clemency and Pardon Information Check Here:


  • Pardon | Seal | Expunge | Tampa Criminal Defense Lawyer ...

    www.centrallaw.net/2011/11/pardon-seal-expunge.html
     Rating: 4.9 - ‎Review by Google+
    A Tampa Bay, Florida resident benefited from a "presidential pardon this week ... Furthermore, "if you are seeking clemency for a state criminal conviction, you ...
  • Video - Clemency Attorney Continues Efforts to Free Federal ...

    www.centrallaw.net/2014/04/video-clemency-attorney-continues.html
     Rating: 4.9 - ‎Review by Google+
    Apr 21, 2014 - Federal Clemency Lawyer http://www.centrallaw.com/practice-areas/tampa-criminal-attorney/clemency-petitions-pardons/ in Tampa, Florida is ...
  • Tampa Criminal Defense Lawyer On Call 813-222-2220 ...

    www.centrallaw.net/2011_11_01_archive.html
     Rating: 4.9 - ‎Review by Google+
    Nov 16, 2011 - A Tampa Bay, Florida resident benefited from a "presidential pardon this week ... Furthermore, "if you are seeking clemency for a state criminal ...
  • FOX 13 News Tampa Bay - video feed - Tampa Criminal ...

    www.centrallaw.net/2014_04_01_archive.html
    Apr 1, 2014 - Federal Clemency Lawyer http://www.centrallaw.com/practice-areas/tampa-criminal-attorney/clemency-petitions-pardons/ in Tampa, Florida is ..
  • www.centrallaw.net/2010/05/attorney-general-internal-memo-on.html
     Rating: 4.9 - ‎Review by Google+
    May 19, 2010 - From: Eric H Holder, Jr. Attorney General. Subject: Department Policy on Charging and Sentencing. The reasoned exercise of prosecutorial ...

  • Friday, August 29, 2014

    Lyft on Trial in Tampa, Florida

    Judge or Jury will soon decide: Does a Lyft car meet the definition of taxicab?

    *Lyft Technology on Trial in Tampa* Lyft ride sharing service is under attack by taxicab regulators. With Lyft, rides are arranged by smart phone app, drivers take no money from customers. fares are donations, riders can pay all of fare, part  or none  at all. Today in a Hillsborough County Courtroom, government offered to let a  driver pay  fines, but he refused the offer, opting for the jury trial.

    Brave driver said, “We are not a cab,” he said. “We are not a transportation company. Lyft is a platform and I’m an independent contractor.” More information on the law in Tampa is here.

    Here are a few Legal Definitions

    Definition: “Taxicab” means any motor-driven Vehicle, equipped with a Taximeter, with a Capacity for 9 or less passengers, including the driver, for the transportation of For hire passengers, which Operates within Hillsborough County, but does not include Sight-seeing cars or buses, streetcars, or motor buses Operated pursuant to franchise. Taxicab includes the Taxicab classification of Standard Taxicab and Luxury Taxicab. Unless otherwise indicated, use of the word “Taxicab” within these Rules shall be meant to include “Standard Taxicabs” and “Luxury Taxicabs”, collectively. 

    “Taximeter” means any internally mounted device that records and indicates a rate of fare measured by distance traveled, time traveled, waiting time, or extra passengers which has been inspected and sealed by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services and which has been calibrated to the approved rates promulgated by the Commission.

    Source: http://www.hillsboroughcounty.org/DocumentCenter/View/6827

    Source: http://tbo.com/news/breaking-news/fight-between-hillsborough-and-ride-sharing-services-goes-up-a-notch-20140828/


    Friday, August 15, 2014

    Tampa Computer Trial Attorney - Lawyer on Computers in Court

    Tampa Computer Trial Attorney - Lawyer on Computers in Court



    Law Enforcement and attorneys for the other side have a team working against you. Why not have your own Forensics Team working for you? More than ninety percent (90%) of documents are now created electronically, and less than thirty percent (30%) of those electronic documents are ever converted to paper. Rules on preserving electronically stored information and strategies to recover that data make having a Forensic eDiscovery team more important than ever before.

    Tampa Computer Trial Attorney - Lawyer
    Police have specialized equipment analyzing original digital media such as hard drives, disks, and flash drives, and optical disk drives in the computer forensics lab. There is special hardware and software that retrieves evidence from cell phones, including text messages (SMS) and pictures. For computers, specialized software is used to examine the computers and extract the evidence. We can too.

    We use a team of attorney(s) and forensics expert(s) to help sort through data used in prosecution of federal indictments and state charges, fraud, hacking, theft of trade secrets, and other forms of cybercrimes.

    With surge in popularity of mobile devices we can now forensically retrieve Information from mobile devices.  We also provide help in searching corporate e-mail, personal e-mail, Short Message Service (SMS) text messages, personal notes, calendar entries, photographs, address books, and inbound and outbound call logs. This type of information can be invaluable to prove certain facts for a case. 

    Remember - an expert can help preserve the chain of custody and this data can then be used in litigation.

    Computer in Court? Tell Me Your Story Toll Free 1-877-793-9290 .

    Saturday, July 12, 2014

    Need To Know Facebook Personal Information Disclosures!

    Court Order, Discovery, Facebook,  subpoena, account information, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(b)(1)
    Court Order Was Improper
    What happens when employers get access to your Facebook profile? This seems to occur when disclosure is a condition of employment or part of the job interview process. Arguably, this is with consent. 

    What happens when an opponent in court tries to force the enemy to grant access to a Facebook page or social graph? This can occur when a Court Order directs a reluctant person to disclose their online lives. When police or prosecutors want records from social media websites like Facebook, they need only comply with this procedure and get an appropriate Court Order. When private parties want information the process is similar. You can review your own Facebook information to see what is found in your account information:  How can I download my information from Facebook?

    Facebook says, "We work with law enforcement where appropriate and to the extent required by law . . . ."

    You may wonder; Does Facebook tell you that someone else is trying to get your account information? The answer is not always. The company tells us, "Facebook may notify users before responding to legal process as permitted by law." See https://www.facebook.com/help/473784375984502 . The exception occurs when certain laws allow companies to respond to subpoenas in secrecy.

    "Facebook may notify users before responding to legal process as permitted by law."
    Uncovering a witness' past using social media is a common tactic. These disclosures are granted under Florida law's fairly broad standard that the person must disclose relevant information or information reasonably likely to lead to relevant evidence. However, one court in Florida in a traffic accident case drew the line and called efforts by Defendants overly broad and probably amounted to a fishing expedition.

    Facebook Court Order

    One Florida Court ordered a user to produce information on:

    1. Counseling or psychological care  
    2. Photos, "likes" or videos 
    3. Relationships with her other children, both prior to, and following, the accident; 
    4. Relationships with other family members,  boyfriends, husbands, and/or significant others,  both prior to, and following the accident; 
    5. Mental health, stress complaints, alcohol use  or other substance use, both prior to and after,  the accident; 
    6. Postings relating to any  lawsuit filed 
    Case Ruling:

    "Under the basic principles for evaluating discovery in Florida, the party seeking discovery must establish that it is (1) relevant to the case's subject matter, and (2) admissible in court or reasonably calculated to lead to evidence that is admissible in court. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(b)(1); Langston, 655 So. 2d at 94. We agree . . . Defendants have not met this burden as to the requested discovery." 


    Why did this Court decide the Facebook information was not relevant?

    The court observed, "the requested discovery constitutes a fishing expedition. The defendant's attorney stated, "These are all things that we would like to look under the hood, so to speak, and figure out whether that's even a theory worth exploring." Even the magistrate acknowledged that relevancy might be a problem, noting that "95 percent, or 99 percent of this may not be relevant."


    Source: http://www.2dca.org/opinions/Opinion_Pages/Opinion_Pages_2014/February/February%2005,%202014/2D13-3205.pdf

    Five Legal Questions Answered Here:

    What happens when an opponent in court tries to force the enemy to grant access to a Facebook page or social graph?

    What happens when employers get access to your Facebook profile?

    Does Facebook tell you that someone else is trying to get your account information?

    How can I download my information from Facebook?

    Does Facebook tell you that someone else is trying to get your account information?

    Friday, July 04, 2014

    History of Cell Phone Searches

    Cell Phone Search Warrant
    Search Warrant
    Cell Phone
    Up until quite recently, there were exceptions to the general requirement that police get a Search Warrant for a cell phone. Cell phones have been a window into suspects’ activities, as police used these exceptions to get their hands on information found inside mobile devices. Obtaining a Search Warrant for a cell phone is not that hard to do. You can review a Search Warrant for a Cell Phone here:  Here is an actual iPhone Search Warrant . GPS or Global Positioning Satellite information found in mobile phones has also been used by police. 

    Up until around 2014, police could and did search digital information on a cell phone seized from an individual who was arrested. Defense Attorneys would frequently challenge such searches. These searches were frequently based upon “helping” arrested citizens by making sure their property was properly inventoried by the arresting officers for safekeeping by jail personnel or by the evidence unit at the arresting agency’s office. This rationale remains a frequent flier in broad invasive “inventory” searches of automobiles during traffic stops.

    Cell Phone Search, Search and Seizure, Search Warrant


    Cell Phone Search, Search and Seizure, Search Warrant
    Warrant Required
    Mobile Devices
    Florida had outlawed warrantless phone searches before the US Supreme Court. That ruling is discussed here. Now prohibited will be mobile device and cell phone searches without a warrant. Before the 2014 United States Supreme Court ruling here was another Court's Ruling on a Cell Phone Search. Searches Incident to a lawful arrest were previously justified by cops using issues of police officer safety and prevention of destruction of evidence.

    Now under Florida law, a Motion to Suppress Evidence can be filed pursuant to Rule 3.190(h), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Illegal Search and seizure now applies to cell phones and the Courts may exclude illegally obtained evidence including, photographs, video, text messages, directory and location data, voice mails, and emails.

    Case Summary: The US Supreme Court's ruling is that a properly obtained and issued search warrant is generally required before search of a cell phone. Here is some language from the Court’s ruling. 

    "Cell phones differ in both a quantitative and a qualitative sense from other objects that might be kept on an arrestee’s person. The term “cell phone” is itself misleading shorthand; many of these devices are in fact minicomputers that also happen to have the capacity to be used as a telephone. They could just as easily be called cameras,video players, rolodexes, calendars, tape recorders, libraries, diaries, albums, televisions, maps, or newspapers."

    "The sum of an individual’s private life can be reconstructed through a thousand photographs labeledwith dates, locations, and descriptions; the same cannot besaid of a photograph or two of loved ones tucked into a wallet."

    "To further complicate the scope of the privacy interests at stake, the data a user views on many modern cell phones may not in fact be stored on the device itself. Treating a cell phone as a container whose contents may be searched incident to an arrest is a bit strained as an initial matter."

    "[T]he search incident to arrest exception does not apply to cell phones . . . ."

    Some Excerpts from Florida Cases:

    "However, we express great concern in permitting the officer to search appellant’s cell phone here where there was no indication the officer had reason to believe the cell phone contained evidence."

    “We are equally concerned that giving officers unbridled discretion to rummage through at will the entire contents of one’s cell phone, even where there is no basis for believing evidence of the crime of arrest will be found on the phone, creates a serious and recurring threat to the privacy of countless individuals.”